A machine executes, a human decides – that was the unspoken agreement on which decades of industrial automation rested. The machine printed, placed, soldered. The process engineer adjusted, assessed, corrected. The division of labour was clear.
This issue shows how quickly that balance is shifting. AI-powered inspection systems now intervene actively in the print process – not after the fact, but in real time. MES platforms run 300mm fabs with minimal
operator presence. And at APEX EXPO in Anaheim, which this issue covers
in depth, the verdict was consistent: manufacturing is moving away from
reactive correction and towards anticipatory control.
Data is key
Investing in production technology today means more than specifying a line. It means deciding which process data to capture, who can access it, and what the system is permitted to do with it. That is not a question of software architecture. It is a question of manufacturing strategy.
However, fully autonomous decisions made by AI are not currently up for discussion – not for technical reasons, but for legal ones. As soon as a system makes decisions independently, the question of legal responsibility arises: does it lie with the AI provider, the device manufacturer or the on-site operator? As long as this question remains unanswered, a human will remain part of the control loop – not as a relic of the old division of labour, but as the legally responsible party.
This shift is not happening only in the development labs of major equipment suppliers. It is happening in Modena, in Budapest, in Aachen. Those who want to shape it must first understand it.
Stay informed:
